The Genesis of Science James Hannam 9781621573074 Books
Download As PDF : The Genesis of Science James Hannam 9781621573074 Books
The Not-So-Dark Dark Ages
What they forgot to teach you in school
People in the Middle Ages did not think the world was flat
The Inquisition never executed anyone because of their scientific ideologies
It was medieval scientific discoveries, including various methods, that made possible Western civilization’s “Scientific Revolution”
As a physicist and historian of science James Hannam debunks myths of the Middle Ages in his brilliant book The Genesis of Science How the Christian Middle Ages Launched the Scientific Revolution. Without the medieval scholars, there would be no modern science.
Discover the Dark Ages and their inventions, research methods, and what conclusions they actually made about the shape of the world.
The Genesis of Science James Hannam 9781621573074 Books
I highly recommend this book since it shows in great detail that during the middle ages the required groundwork to launch the "scientific revolution" was done. It explain clearly how aristotelism shaped the world view of the west and how rational thought came to be highly regarded. I have one question I would like to be considered for a second edition and a comment.1- If the assimilation of classical Greek science in the 12th century produced such a revival in learning in the west so that 500 years later the birth of modern science took place, why in the east where this learning was never lost did not develop modern science first?
2- The book in page 322 says "Official Catholic doctrine laid down by the recent Council of Trent said that the bible was only without error in matters
of faith and morals". This statement is not true. Trent did not deal with scripture inerrancy at all(it was not an issue at the time) but with the canon of scripture. The first council to explicitly deal with the issue of inerrancy in scripture was Vatican I(1869-1870). As a matter of fact the statement that "the bible is without error in matters of faith and morals only", is a theological opinion rejected by the ordinary magisterium of the church, Pope Leo XIII(1878-1903) and Pope Pius XII(1939-1958).
Product details
|
Tags : The Genesis of Science [James Hannam] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. <div><BR><B>The Not-So-Dark Dark Ages</B><BR><BR>What they forgot to teach you in school:<BR>People in the Middle Ages did <I>not</I> think the world was flat<BR>The Inquisition never executed <I>anyone</I> because of their scientific ideologies It was medieval scientific discoveries,James Hannam,The Genesis of Science,Regnery History,1621573079,History,History Of Science,Medieval,Religion & Science,Science,Science History,ScienceMathematics
People also read other books :
- Parnassus on Wheels Christopher Morley 9781534982086 Books
- The Art Science of Aromatherapy Your Guide for Personal Aromatherapy Kayla Fioravanti 9780615771625 Books
- Foundations Of Potential Theory Oliver Dimon Kellogg 9781258296117 Books
- Christian Romance A Dream Comes to Pinesdale Christian Historical Romance edition by Verdie Religion Spirituality eBooks
- Tales Illustrated edition by Edgar Allan Poe Arthur Rackham Literature Fiction eBooks
The Genesis of Science James Hannam 9781621573074 Books Reviews
Dr. Hannam has written an important book that sets the historical record straight about the Middle Ages. Anyone who loves science or history (or both) will enjoy this book.
It is important to point out that this book is not a defense of the Christian faith, although after reading this book it is reasonable to conclude that religious faith and science are not as incompatible as we have been led to believe. The book also does not whitewash terrible episodes such as the Inquisition or the trail of Galileo. Rather, it attempts to cut through the modern mythology that has surrounded the Middle Ages. The "Dark Ages" were actually a time of major scientific progress - and that progress was often supported and funded by the Church. Hannam also offers a fascinating view of how what we call "the scientific method" came to be, and how today's scientists owe a debt of gratitude to those from the Middle Ages.
In The Genesis of Science, Dr. Hannam seems to have two main purposes. First, he wants to demonstrate that the so-called "Dark Ages" were not so dark; that, in fact, the groundwork for modern science was laid during this time. And, second, that the Catholic Church was not the enemy of science; that, in fact, it was the Church that supported science in its birth. Dr. Hannam is moderately successful in achieving both of these purposes.
The fact that modern science did not spring like Athena from the minds of men like Kepler and Galileo around 1600 is not really a surprise. And Dr. Hannam does a nice job discussing some of the important precursors like the rise of universities and the translations into Latin of classical texts during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. He takes us through an entire series of important men and their discoveries of the period from about 1200 - 1600, which is very well done and fascinating. But he seems to overreach a bit. Despite his claim that important things were going on from 476 - 1200, apart from a few scattered names and small achievements, the Dark Ages still seem pretty dark for about 700 years.
As for the Church, Dr. Hannam tries his best to make the medieval institution the incubator of knowledge that will bring modern science to life. In this he is less successful. That the Church often played a positive role in the development of universities and the recovery of classical knowledge is true. On the other hand, his argument that the Inquisition wasn't as bad is it is made out to be or that men like Bruno and Galileo brought many of their problems on themselves while true to a certain extent, doesn't really exonerate the Church.
Overall, however, Dr. Hannam has done a yeoman's service to the history of science by putting the advances of the late middle ages back in the spotlight. I was a bit surprised that James J. Walsh's wonderful book The Thirteenth Greatest of Centuries wasn't cited in Dr. Hannam's bibliography. Though Walsh's book covers the wider cultural milieu, they tread a lot of the same ground. Still, Walsh's 1907 book is a bit hard to read for modern audiences. After 100+ years, it's nice to see a solid work on this interesting subject.
The author shows where often-repeated myths about Medieval times are false. The over-arching myth he debunks is that Christianity was antagonistic to proto-scientists. In fact "natural philosophy" was nurtured at the Church sponsored universities. The scholars were religious men who considered themselves to be investigating God's creation. Many of them were even members of the clergy.
Hannam points out that science did not spring into being with men of the Renaissance. They were building on the work that had been done before them. The Middle ages were not a time of stagnation, but of deep thought and progress.
I enjoyed reading this book. I found it interesting to learn how scholars used one concept to build on and discover the next concept. They were having to figure out from scratch many things that we just take for granted. It was not easy to distinguish truth from error. I admire how they were able to accomplish so much in the difficult circumstances in which they lived.
This book is so interesting that as soon as I finished it, I started it again. It's main focus is on rehabilitating the history of the Middle Ages, something that got thoroughly trashed after the fact by protestant and atheist authors who didn't want to give Catholic Europe any credit for anything good. But it's not a "rah-rah Catholic" version of Medieval history. Hannam gives credit where credit is due to church, state, and proto-scientists. But he is not shy about revealing the warts wherever they existed.
I highly recommend this book since it shows in great detail that during the middle ages the required groundwork to launch the "scientific revolution" was done. It explain clearly how aristotelism shaped the world view of the west and how rational thought came to be highly regarded. I have one question I would like to be considered for a second edition and a comment.
1- If the assimilation of classical Greek science in the 12th century produced such a revival in learning in the west so that 500 years later the birth of modern science took place, why in the east where this learning was never lost did not develop modern science first?
2- The book in page 322 says "Official Catholic doctrine laid down by the recent Council of Trent said that the bible was only without error in matters
of faith and morals". This statement is not true. Trent did not deal with scripture inerrancy at all(it was not an issue at the time) but with the canon of scripture. The first council to explicitly deal with the issue of inerrancy in scripture was Vatican I(1869-1870). As a matter of fact the statement that "the bible is without error in matters of faith and morals only", is a theological opinion rejected by the ordinary magisterium of the church, Pope Leo XIII(1878-1903) and Pope Pius XII(1939-1958).
0 Response to "[D33]⋙ Download Gratis The Genesis of Science James Hannam 9781621573074 Books"
Post a Comment